Skip Navigation Links.
Collapse Issue 560:<br />9 Jan 2023<br />_____________Issue 560:
9 Jan 2023
_____________
Collapse  NEWS NEWS
Council to classify 357 blocks as 'community land'
Power blackout across the Peninsula
Peninsula groups benefit from Gosford electorate grants
Marine flare collection
Banner celebrates last school visit by Nambus
Lions Club raises $12,000 in cake and pudding sales
Council rejects grant applications from Peninsula groups
Shade trees group highlights 'good' developments
Pearl Beach establishes neighbour messaging network
Older women raise $3500 for food hampers
Woy Woy law firm recognised in leading legal directory
Beach wheelchairs and matting available over summer
Volunteer wins Paul Harris Award from Rotary
Local submissions wanted for Federal Budget
World of Magic at Woy Woy library
Groups encouraged to apply for war memorial grants
Learn about creatures that live in rock pools
Equal wettest year in 58 years
Collapse  PLANNING PLANNING
Three-storey block of flats proposed for Broken Bay Rd
'Pre-DA' comments reveal council staff thinking
Dual occupancy exhibited without application details
Proposal for four townhouses in Allfield Rd
Dual occupancy subdivision gives 310 square metre lot
Two-storey child care centre proposed for quiet area
New kitchen and gaming area plans for hotel renovation
Collapse  FORUM FORUM
Development control needs root and branch rethink
Not community consultation, and not sustainable
Heat island effect will be out of control in five years' time
Jet skis - we need to do something
Value your local newspaper - support Peninsula News
Collapse  HEALTH HEALTH
Aged care home surveys relatives about its services
After Christmas, craft group prepares for Mother's Day
Virus numbers increase by half before dropping more
Collapse  ARTS ARTS
Bush dance to be held at Pearl Beach
Little Theatre to hold auditions for Agatha Christie play
Tutor wanted for silver jewellery-making classes
Collapse  EDUCATION EDUCATION
Special assembly for long-serving school librarian
Ettalong staff move on
Tesch calls for nominations for youth parliament
School holidays course for learner drivers
Collapse  SPORT SPORT
Call to move pennant finals when Ettalong plays
Bridge team is NSW Country Champions
Umina bowling club appoints new treasurer
Bicycle group plans two rides from Woy Woy
Bunnies Juniors introduce high performance academy
Applications open for defibrillator grants
Year's first red-point event attracts 28 pairs
Bowling club announces smartphone app
Physie club to hold information stall

Development control needs root and branch rethink

The ink is barely dry on the Minister's approval of the Development Control Plan (DCP), and the Local Planning Panel is already calling for a review of its provisions ("Panel recommends strategic planning review", PN559).

For those of us who have been saying from the start that the DCP is arbitrary, inconsistent and inappropriate, it is gratifying to have an official body agreeing in that judgement.

But it is depressing that years have been spent on this futile exercise, and we have nothing more fit for purpose than this hodgepodge of ill-informed prejudice and ineffective restrictions.

There was never any attempt to make a proper review of the old DCP: the new one was just cobbled up out of the bits and pieces of the old Gosford and Wyong documents which were acknowledged by everybody to be useless and which were consistently breached by the Council itself in approving non-conforming developments.

It is not surprising that the brand-new DCP has made absolutely no difference to the number of applications for non-conforming developments.

This is because there is no logical basis for any of the DCP standards, so any developer is entitled to put forward his own suggestions as to what is appropriate.

It is also not surprising that many ratepayers are unhappy with developments that do meet the DCP standards.

This is because the DCP standards have no relationship to reality and do not contribute to producing the end-product that ratepayers want to see.

The window-dressing of "community consultation" was never more than a smokescreen to conceal the fact that the Administrator never intended to take notice of any opinion but his own in approving the DCP, so it could only be expected that most people are going to be dissatisfied with the results.

It is easy to predict that there will be some grudging response to the Panel's recommendation, mainly focussed on demonstrating that all the provisions were right to start with and that only a disgruntled minority could possibly find fault with them.

Then, as a gesture, some small adjustments will be made to a few trivial measures (probably, to make things a bit easier for developers), and the whole rigmarole of Ministerial approval will be repeated.

This, of course, will achieve nothing, because only a root and branch rethinking of the whole DCP mess can serve the purpose.

Land-use zoning is a blunt instrument at the best of times but, when it is as badly conceived as the present DCP is, we can expect nothing good from it - and we shall not be disappointed.





Skip Navigation Links.

Skip Navigation Links.

Peninsula
Planning
Portal
HERE
     Phone 4342 5333     Email us. Copyright © 2023 The Peninsula's Own News Service Inc ABN 76 179 701 372    PO Box 585 Woy Woy NSW 2256